image 2 image 4
Skip Navigation Links
 Home 
 Congress Structure 
 Important Dates 
 Venue 
 Registration 
 Pre Registered 
 Abstracts 
 Scientific Program 
 Photo and Film Festival 
 Exhibition 
 Contact Us 
 Personal page 
       XXVIII Annual Congress of the Iranian Society of Ophthalmology        بـیــست و هشتمین کنــگــره سـالیـانه انـجـمـن چـشـم پـزشـکی ایـــران
مقاله Abstract


Title: Comparison of visual performance and optical quality between a diffractive trifocal lens and an extended depth of focus lens.
Author(s): Mohsen farvardin ,mohammadkarim johari
Presentation Type: Oral
Subject: Cornea and Anterior Segment
Others:
Presenting Author:
Name: Mohammad Karim Johari
Affiliation :(optional) assistant professor
E mail: sh034880@yahoo.com
Phone:
Mobile: 09363762201
Purpose:

To compare visual outcomes, optical properties, and subjective quality of vision between bilateral implantation of a diffractive trifocal intraocular lens (IOL), Alcon Acrysof IQ®️ PanOptix®️ TNFT00 (group A), and an extended depth of focus lens, J&J Tecnis Symfony®️ ZXR00 (group B) in patients with senile cataract

Methods:

This prospective comparative study aimed to assess 80 eyes of 40 patients who were implanted with two different types of multifocal IOL each by one surgeon with a follow-up range of 3-18 months. Exclusion criteria were the existence of any ocular disorder and surgery other than cataract. Ophthalmological evaluation included plotting visual defocus curve considering monocular corrected distance visual acuity, and measurement of Binocular uncorrected visual acuity at far , intermediate and near distances. Quality of vision was assessed using VFQ25 questionnaire plus 5 more specified questions evaluating spectacle independence in each visual zone and subjective halo and glare status.

Results:

The total area under defocus curves were 86.65% and 66.41% for groups A and B, respectively. Considering different visual zones, the difference was more evident in the near zone (75.33% vs. 23.50%). The Binocular uncorrected visual acuities were significantly better for the group A at near(P<0.001) with no statistical significance difference at other distances. Total VFQ25 scores were 87.3 and 76.3 in groups A and B, respectively(P=0.015). Spectacle independence scores were greater in group A compared to B at near and intermeaiate zones(P<0.001). Scores for lack of halo were lower in group A but not statistically significant(P=0.166

Conclusion:

Both lens combinations were able to provide good far visual acuity; however, for intermediate and specially near distances PanOptix lens showed significantly better performance than Symfony. Regarding spectacle independence, PanOptix Lens was notably better in near and intermediate distances but questionably in exchange for a bit more subjective halo disturbance

Attachment:





Skip Navigation Links
        صفحه اصلی
        ساختار کنگره
        تاریخ های مهم
        مکان برگزاری
        ثبت نام
        ثبت نام شدگان
        اطلاعات هتل - رزرو
        مقالات
        برنامه کنگره
        جشنواره فیلم و عکس
        نمایشگاه
        تماس با ما
        صفحه شخصی
        جستجوی سخنران
        آرشیو کنگره سالهای گذشته
        شب کنگره چشم پزشکی
 
ورود شرکت کنندگان
نام کاربری :
کلمه عبور :
  کلمه عبور خود را فراموش کرده ام.
Total Visits
Find us on Social Media
Congress Count Down
Today Label
Last Month Label
Total Visitors Label